> 2021年06月04日信息消化 #### CTO的旅程 原文：[The Journey Of The CTO (Podcast Transcript)](https://hackernoon.com/the-journey-of-the-cto-podcast-transcript-iut35tf?source=rss) 一个产品或一个想法，或一个想法的原型设计。而随着它的成长，它是一个管理的排序，一个职位更多的领导点极其聪明，比你更聪明，是肯定的。这些工程师和你如何让他们参与进来。这成为一个挑战。你如何设定这种愿景，工程师是非常聪明的一群人，除非他们相信这是你的愿景的实质。 A product or an idea, or the prototyping of an idea. And as as it grows it's a management sort of a position merrier to lead point of extremely smart, smarter than you, for sure. That engineers and how you keep them engaged. That becomes a challenge. How do you set that kind of vision, which engineers, as are a very smart bunch unless they believe that is substance to your vision. 他们通常不会接受这种想法，因为想法是一毛钱一打的。神奇之处在于执行。因此，工程师正在感受所涉及的创新，并将其作为真正的魔法所在。因此，它是在等式的两边。一个是为人们设定正确的技术目标。 They wouldn't typically take that on and as ideas are a dime, a dozen. It's in the execution that the magic lies. And so the engineer is feeling the innovation involved and building that as where the real magic is. So it's in the two sides of the equation. One is setting the right sort of technology goals for the people. 第二是看到它的完成，就像我所说的那样，从想法阶段到实际比特的浓汤，直到你有一个实际工作的软件，并为客户提供价值。它既不那么有用，也不那么令人兴奋。因此，在这个过程中，你，作为一个CTO，你的角色是理解这个需求。 And the second is seeing it through to completion as in, from the idea stage to actually bits on bisque as I call it until you have a piece of software that actually works and delivers value the customer. It's not either that useful or that exciting. So it's in that journey that you, as a CTO your role is to understand that requirement. 因为很多时候客户会告诉你我需要一匹更快的马。这是你的工作，去。告诉他们实际上你需要的是汽车。而这就是我们正在建造的东西。而这发生在不同的层面，以不同的方式。工程师也做同样的事情，因为当你给他们一个要求时，他们会重新想象说，什么是需要建造的？ Because many times customers will tell you I need a faster horse. It's your job to go. Tell them actually what you need is the car. And that's what we're building. And this happens at various levels in various ways. Engineers do the same thing because when you give them a requirement, they reimagine to say, what is it that requires building? 因此，正是在这种翻译中，你在如何塑造和指导产品方面发挥了良好的作用。然后，其余的都是在日常的那种机械性的工作，就是确保团队的运作和团队，德拉瓦，你的产品。你认为市场需要的产品。 So it's in this translation that you play a good role in terms of how to shape and direct the product. And then the rest is all in the sort of mechanics of day-to-day is ensuring that the teams function and the teams, Delaware, the product that you. That you think the market requires. 于是就有了它的第二部分，与客户和市场及行业交谈，看到事情的发展方向，并使其朝着这个方向发展。因此，这是一个啰嗦的说法，你的工作是提供一个产品，从概念到现实，并在这个过程中与所有有创意的和顽固的工程师打交道，让他们高兴，让牛高兴，让Richie高兴。 And so there comes the second part of it, talking to the customers and the market and industry seeing where things are and making it dispense towards that. So that's a long-winded way of saying your job is to deliver a product from conception to reality and in the process Deal with the, all the creative and gnarly engineers and keep them happy and, happy cows make Richie. #### 现代简约UI风格指南 原文：[A guide to the Modern Minimal UI style](https://uxdesign.cc/a-guide-to-the-modern-minimal-ui-style-531ac1e9fbfe) > Functional, readable, sleek, and sexy. 我一直在许多界面中见证着类似的设计风格模式。这些界面看起来非常好--它们很醒目，可读性强，但又很友好，不会太奢侈。我认为它们是一个完美的介于好看和实用之间的设计。 因为这正是设计趋势的主要问题--它们看起来令人着迷，但你无法真正用它们做出功能齐全的产品（毫无疑问，neumorphism或glassmorphism是无法在日常使用中获得的）。 I’ve been witnessing similar design style patterns in many interfaces. These interfaces looked extremely good — they were eye-catching and readable but friendly and not too extravagant. I thought they were a perfect in-between of being good-looking and functional at the same time. Because that’s the main pro 所以，我把这种设计风格称为 "现代极简"。与其他设计风格相比，它很简约，但同时又不像旧的Material Design或Flat那样枯燥无味。你可以在其中发现许多来自不同风格的灵感（比如骨骼变形和玻璃变形，甚至！），但正如你将看到的，所有这些都在一起工作，它并没有超过一定的视觉复杂度。 So, I called this design style “Modern Minimal”. It’s minimalistic comparing to the other design styles, but at the same time is not as dull and boring as old Material Design or Flat. You can spot many inspirations from the different styles in it (like skeumorphism and glassmorphism, even!) but as you will see, it all works together and it doesn’t exceed certain level of visual complexity.blem with design trends — they look mesmerizing, but you can’t really make a fully functional product using them (no doubt that neumorphism or glassmorphism is not accessible enough to use on a daily basis). #### The characteristics 1. 明亮的背景和白色的空间 | Bright backgrounds and whitespace 2. UI元素的微妙的圆度 | Subtle roundness on UI elements 3. 大的、可读的标题 | Big, readable headings 4. 现实生活中的照片 | Real-life photography 5. 对颜色的深思熟虑的使用 | Thoughtful use of colors 6. 注重对比度 | Focus on contrast 7. 对效果的有限使用 | Limited use of effects 8. 小的细节，往往是图文并茂的 | Small details, often illustrated   我喜欢那些又大又胖的标题！它们也使界面看起来更现代。它们也使界面看起来更现代。你可以选择无衬线字体或衬线字体，但就个人而言，我建议坚持使用流行的几何无衬线字体，如Gilroy, Sofia Pro, Lufga, 或Circular。你也可以试试Pulp, Gordita, Visby, Konnect, Geliat, Galano或+Jakarta Sans。 I love those big, fat headings! They are also making the interface look more modern. You can choose between sans-serif or serif, but personally, I’d recommend sticking to the popular geometric sans-serifs like [Gilroy](https://www.myfonts.com/fonts/radomir-tinkov/gilroy?gclid=Cj0KCQjw78yFBhCZARIsAOxgSx2JTGlsfV8BrXbzhbvqM_ZcM3MiP3_CAsPgMCvrOFJQEJdEleVYnqEaAihlEALw_wcB), [Sofia Pro](https://www.myfonts.com/fonts/mostardesign/sofia-pro?tab=familyPackages&gclid=Cj0KCQjw78yFBhCZARIsAOxgSx2f0NjL-Zm3LpeZp7xw6d9ObBfPF_tmOJA7oIcZ1pv_eV-ZtipdSSAaAoUYEALw_wcB), Lufga, or [Circular](https://lineto.com/typefaces/circular). You can also try [Pulp](https://www.myfonts.com/fonts/the-fabriek/pulp-display/), [Gordita](https://www.myfonts.com/fonts/type-atelier/gordita/), [Visby](https://www.myfonts.com/fonts/connary-fagen/visby-cf/), [Konnect](https://www.myfonts.com/fonts/adam-ladd/konnect/), [Geliat](https://www.myfonts.com/fonts/wahyu-sani-co/geliat-/), [Galano](https://www.myfonts.com/fonts/rene-bieder/galano-grotesque/) or [+Jakarta Sans](https://opensourcelibs.com/lib/plusjakartasans).  现代简约风格在涉及到颜色时往往是非常少的。它们大多被保留给最重要的动作和/或元素上的点缀。 正因为如此，界面看起来很舒服，因为没有大面积的颜色一直在吸引用户的注意力。 Modern Minimal style is often very minimal when it comes to colors. They are mostly reserved for the most important actions and/or accents on elements. Thanks to that, the interface is pleasurable to look at, since no big splashes of colors scream for attention of the user all the time.  现代简约的一个优点是它的Accessibility（这一点显然是大多数风格所不擅长的）。有了足够的对比，我们可以很容易地将背景和元素区分开来，理解视觉层次，轻松地使用界面。 One great thing about Modern Minimal is its accessibility (that one thing that most styles suck at apparently). With enough contrast we can easily differentiate background from the elements, understand the visual hierarchy and use the interface with ease. #### MindSet #### Toxic productivity 私たちが最善を尽くし、計画を立て、今後の課題を予測しようと努力しても、物事は計画通りに進まないことがあります。それはそれで構いません。私たちはロボットではないのですから、常に生産的である必要はありません。 Despite our best intentions, despite all our planning and our efforts to predict upcoming challenges, things don't always go to plan. And that's alright. We are not robots — we don't need to be productive all the time. #### 框定效应：信息的框定方式如何影响我们的决定 原文：[The framing effect: how the way information is framed impacts our decisions](https://nesslabs.com/framing-effect?ck_subscriber_id=1187272855&) ##### Examples of the framing effect There is lots of research supporting the existence of the framing effect, whether it impacts our personal or professional decisions. - 政治观点。斯科特-普劳斯在他的《判断和决策心理学》一书中，解释了政治观点的框架如何影响我们的选择。在一项调查中，62%的受访者不同意允许 "公开谴责民主"，但只有46%的人同意 "禁止公开谴责民主 "是正确的--尽管这两个选项本质上说的是同一件事。 **Political views.** In his [book](https://amzn.to/2S2Y7HW) *The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making*, Scott Plous explains how framing political views can impact our choices. In a survey, 62% of respondents disagreed with allowing “public condemnation of democracy”, but only 46% agreed it was right to “forbid public condemnation of democracy” — even though both options essentially say the same thing. - 时间和金钱管理。框架效应也会影响我们管理时间和金钱的方式。一项研究发现，93%的学生在收到延迟注册的罚款时提前注册，而在收到提前注册的折扣时，只有67%的学生这样做。 **Time and money management.** The framing effect can also impact the way we manage our time and our money. A [study](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167268109000171?via%3Dihub) found that 93% of students were registered early when presented with a penalty fee for late registration, versus only 67% doing so when it was presented as a discount for early registration. - 经济学。研究表明，如果强调就业率（"10%的就业率"），比强调失业率（"90%的失业率"），更多的人会支持一项经济政策。 **Economics.** [Research](https://academic.oup.com/jleo/article/17/1/62/853750) suggests that More people will support an economic policy if the employment rate is highlighted (“10% employment rate”) than when the unemployment rate is emphasised (“90% unemployment rate”). ##### How to manage the framing effect - Consider the current frame. - Reverse the frame - Reframe the options - Think like an outsider - Take your time ### 彻底戒掉咖啡和其他咖啡因的非常指南 原文：[A Very Thorough Guide to Quitting Coffee and Other Caffeine](https://betterhumans.pub/how-to-quit-caffeine-in-one-week-e041892698ec) #### 为什么你不应该摄入很多咖啡因？ Why You Shouldn’t Be Consuming Much Caffeine Anyway 每个人都知道咖啡因会扰乱你的睡眠，但大多数人都大大低估了它有多容易扰乱睡眠。在下午停止摄入咖啡因的标准建议实际上还远远不够，因为即使是在早晨第一件事中摄入适量的咖啡因--比如一杯双份浓缩咖啡或两杯咖啡--也能在很大程度上减少当天晚上的深度睡眠时间。 Everyone knows that caffeine can disrupt your sleep, but most people vastly underestimate just how easily it can do so. The standard advice to stop consuming caffeine in the afternoon actually doesn’t go nearly far enough, because even a single moderate dose of caffeine consumed first thing in the morning—such as a double espresso or two cups of coffee—can measurably reduce the amount of time spent in deep sleep later that night. 尽管到了晚上，咖啡因几乎完全从你的血液中消失，但这种减少还是发生了；也就是说，它的影响似乎超过了咖啡因本身的活跃期。请注意，在下午消费的更小剂量的咖啡因，如一罐苏打水，在这个时候也会被代谢掉，因此可以预期会有同样的效果。 This reduction occurs despite the fact that by nighttime, the caffeine is almost entirely gone from your bloodstream; that is, its effects seem to last beyond the active life of caffeine itself. Note that a much smaller dose of caffeine consumed in the afternoon, like a can of soda, will also have been metabolized by this time and thus could be expected to have the same effect. 咖啡因也会引起焦虑--事实上，这可能是其睡眠抑制作用背后的一个次要机制。即使是150毫克的咖啡因，通常被认为是中等剂量，也会显著增加大多数人的焦虑水平。 Caffeine also causes anxiety—in fact, this is likely a secondary mechanism behind its sleep-inhibiting effects. Even 150 mg of caffeine, usually considered a moderate dose, will significantly increase anxiety levels in most people. 每天饮用更低剂量的咖啡因会产生更糟糕的长期影响。如果你每天定期消费超过100毫克，你会经历焦虑增加和皮质醇水平的长期升高。当然，皮质醇被称为身体的主要 "压力荷尔蒙"。虽然它并不像人们常说的那样是一种坏的激素--例如，你希望它在早上第一件事就是高的，但皮质醇水平的长期升高是整体健康状况不佳的最可靠的生物标志之一。 Daily consumption of even lower doses of caffeine can have even worse long-term effects. If you regularly consume more than 100 mg a day, you’ll experience increased anxiety and have chronically elevated cortisol levels. Cortisol, of course, is known as the body’s main “stress hormone.” And while it’s not as bad of a hormone as it’s often made out to be—you want it to be high first thing in the morning, for instance—chronically elevated cortisol levels are one of the most reliable biomarkers of poor overall health. 当你的皮质醇水平持续偏高时，你可能会更早死亡。如果这还不够糟糕的话，较高的皮质醇水平也会使你从运动中恢复的能力减半--这意味着你会比低皮质醇时取得一半的进展，并且在出现过度训练的症状之前只能运动一半的量。 When your cortisol levels are consistently high, you’re likely to die sooner. As if that wasn’t bad enough, higher cortisol levels can also cut your ability to recover from exercise in half—meaning you’ll make half as much progress as you would with low cortisol and only be able to exercise half as much before experiencing symptoms of overtraining. 说了这么多，这里有一个好消息。你不需要永远戒掉咖啡因，但习惯性使用者应该每隔一段时间就进行一到两周的咖啡因排毒。值得庆幸的是，有一种方法可以在一周内戒掉咖啡因的瘾，而且痛苦很小。 With all that said, there is good news here. You don’t need to quit caffeine forever, but habitual users should go on a one- to two-week caffeine detox every so often. Thankfully, there’s a way to kick a caffeine addiction in one week with very little pain. ### 一点收获 - [Inosculation](https://twitter.com/ferrisjabr/status/1395877507291783169?ck_subscriber_id=1187272855) : when branches or roots of different trees are in prolonged intimate contact, they often abrade each other, exposing their inner tissues, which may eventually fuse. inosculation：当不同树木的枝条或根系长期亲密接触时，它们往往会相互磨擦，暴露出其内部组织，最终可能融合。 - Ever wonder what success looks like? Measure it.